NJS wrote:GTboy wrote:IOW's, non-sane people should not have (for example) freedom of speech in the same way sane people do.
Now, I'm not discriminating against people with mental illnesses, just that there should be reasonable limits set on their interaction with society.
Are you truly that fucking stupid? Is there a prize for biggest fuckwit?
lukenowlan wrote:I'm schizophrenic GTboy, you think I'm sub-human or something do ya? I shouldnt have rights? Well rights or no I'd still fuck you up six ways from sunday if i got my hands on you (no matter which one of us was in charge at the time)
?bubba zanetti wrote:But the 60 is just so impersonal
lucifer_mr2 wrote:Charlene has been given a good home now.

GTboy wrote:NJS wrote:GTboy wrote:IOW's, non-sane people should not have (for example) freedom of speech in the same way sane people do.
Now, I'm not discriminating against people with mental illnesses, just that there should be reasonable limits set on their interaction with society.
Are you truly that fucking stupid? Is there a prize for biggest fuckwit?
Use quotation marks or bold type next time. It will really bring out the 'fuck' in your invective...lukenowlan wrote:I'm schizophrenic GTboy, you think I'm sub-human or something do ya? I shouldnt have rights? Well rights or no I'd still fuck you up six ways from sunday if i got my hands on you (no matter which one of us was in charge at the time)
The irony of at least some of that statement isn't lost on you?
My point was, IN MY OPINION, the Pope's (and all other followers of faith-based religious organisation's) wingnuttery is akin to SEVERE mental-illness.
He/they should not have unfettered access to free society.
Furthermore, it was meant to be tongue-in-cheek. Do you write replies as such to the likes of Sacha Baron-Cohen?
Now, if you take offense at either: the idea that religious people are mentally-ill, or; that by association, mentally-ill people are being compared to the Pope,
then I could care less.
Besides, they're WORDS - you're carrying on like I raped your Sister.
Last time I looked at the rules pertaining to this part of the Forum, you and I should be able to accept a bit of stick from time to time.
Or have I accidentally stumbled into the 'discussions for the overly-sensitive biker' sub-Forum? I shall desist immediately if that's the case.
I'm not going to apologise for your offense at what I write having not known your background, and I dare say you won't to me either.
Don't pretend by reading a couple of sentences, you know me as I won't presume to know you.
If you don't like my opinion, don't read it.
Cheers
GTboy
GTboy wrote:NJS wrote:GTboy wrote:IOW's, non-sane people should not have (for example) freedom of speech in the same way sane people do.
Now, I'm not discriminating against people with mental illnesses, just that there should be reasonable limits set on their interaction with society.
Are you truly that fucking stupid? Is there a prize for biggest fuckwit?
Use quotation marks or bold type next time. It will really bring out the 'fuck' in your invective...lukenowlan wrote:I'm schizophrenic GTboy, you think I'm sub-human or something do ya? I shouldnt have rights? Well rights or no I'd still fuck you up six ways from sunday if i got my hands on you (no matter which one of us was in charge at the time)
The irony of at least some of that statement isn't lost on you?
My point was, IN MY OPINION, the Pope's (and all other followers of faith-based religious organisation's) wingnuttery is akin to SEVERE mental-illness.
He/they should not have unfettered access to free society.
Furthermore, it was meant to be tongue-in-cheek. Do you write replies as such to the likes of Sacha Baron-Cohen?
Now, if you take offense at either: the idea that religious people are mentally-ill, or; that by association, mentally-ill people are being compared to the Pope,
then I could care less.
Besides, they're WORDS - you're carrying on like I raped your Sister.
Last time I looked at the rules pertaining to this part of the Forum, you and I should be able to accept a bit of stick from time to time.
Or have I accidentally stumbled into the 'discussions for the overly-sensitive biker' sub-Forum? I shall desist immediately if that's the case.
I'm not going to apologise for your offense at what I write having not known your background, and I dare say you won't to me either.
Don't pretend by reading a couple of sentences, you know me as I won't presume to know you.
If you don't like my opinion, don't read it.
Cheers
GTboy
GTboy wrote:NJS wrote:GTboy wrote:IOW's, non-sane people should not have (for example) freedom of speech in the same way sane people do.
Now, I'm not discriminating against people with mental illnesses, just that there should be reasonable limits set on their interaction with society.
Are you truly that fucking stupid? Is there a prize for biggest fuckwit?
Use quotation marks or bold type next time. It will really bring out the 'fuck' in your invective...lukenowlan wrote:I'm schizophrenic GTboy, you think I'm sub-human or something do ya? I shouldnt have rights? Well rights or no I'd still fuck you up six ways from sunday if i got my hands on you (no matter which one of us was in charge at the time)
The irony of at least some of that statement isn't lost on you?
My point was, IN MY OPINION, the Pope's (and all other followers of faith-based religious organisation's) wingnuttery is akin to SEVERE mental-illness.
He/they should not have unfettered access to free society.
Furthermore, it was meant to be tongu...
Blah, blah, blah.
If you don't like my opinion, don't read it.
Cheers
GTboy
Users browsing this forum: petercb750 and 0 guests